Comparison

Relaticle vs Twenty

Relaticle and Twenty CRM are both AGPL-3.0, self-hostable CRMs, so the choice comes down to what you're optimizing for. Pick Relaticle if you want AI tooling (chat and MCP) that runs fully self-hosted, plus flat pricing that doesn't grow with headcount. Pick Twenty if you want the larger open-source community or prefer a Node/NestJS stack over Laravel and PHP.

Relaticle vs Twenty at a glance

  • License

    Relaticle: AGPL-3.0

    Twenty: AGPL-3.0 + Twenty Application Exception (enterprise files license-tagged in-repo)

  • Pricing model

    Relaticle: $24/mo flat (or $19/mo billed annually), unlimited users, AI credit packs on top

    Twenty: Pro $9/user/mo, Organization $19/user/mo (billed yearly), Enterprise from $50k/yr

  • GitHub stars

    Relaticle: 1,518 stars (as of Aug 18, 2026)

    Twenty: 54,877 stars (as of Aug 13, 2026)

  • Contributors

    Relaticle: 7 contributors (as of Aug 18, 2026)

    Twenty: 466 contributors (as of Aug 13, 2026)

  • Tech stack

    Relaticle: Laravel 13 + Filament 5, single-server deploy

    Twenty: Node/NestJS + Redis + Postgres + background workers

  • AI & MCP capabilities

    Relaticle: 37 first-party MCP tools plus a built-in AI chat assistant; MCP, chat, and Ollama all work self-hosted

    Twenty: First-party MCP server with OAuth, documented for both Cloud and self-hosted deployments (docs.twenty.com)

  • Self-hosting & deployment

    Relaticle: Self-host free under AGPL-3.0, no feature gating

    Twenty: Self-hostable core; enterprise-tagged files are license-restricted

  • Extensibility

    Relaticle: REST API plus a 37-tool MCP server; the entire codebase is AGPL-3.0, so any part can be forked and extended directly

    Twenty: MIT-licensed apps SDK (twenty-sdk, create-twenty-app) for building custom objects, server logic, and UI components as TypeScript packages, per docs.twenty.com/developers; the core CRM repo itself stays AGPL-3.0 + Twenty Application Exception

How do Relaticle and Twenty pricing compare?

Relaticle charges $24/mo flat (or $19/mo billed annually), unlimited users, AI credit packs on top. The bill is the same whether two people use the workspace or two hundred. Twenty prices per user (Pro $9/user/mo, Organization $19/user/mo (billed yearly), Enterprise from $50k/yr), so its bill scales with every seat you add, and the gap between the two models widens as your team grows. On licensing, both projects publish under AGPL-3.0; Twenty adds a Twenty Application Exception that license-tags its enterprise files in-repo, which means some functionality stays legally reserved even in a self-hosted deploy. Relaticle has no equivalent carve-out: the self-hosted and hosted versions run the same codebase with no feature gating.

Which one runs AI and MCP self-hosted?

Relaticle ships 37 first-party MCP tools plus a built-in AI chat assistant; MCP, chat, and Ollama all work self-hosted. Every write the built-in assistant proposes renders as an approval card showing old value to new value, per field. It executes only when a human accepts it, so the AI layer is safe to point at real customer data. Twenty's offering is First-party MCP server with OAuth, documented for both Cloud and self-hosted deployments (docs.twenty.com). Self-hosters get the core CRM, but the AI tooling itself is Cloud-oriented, and its public self-hosting documentation does not describe an equivalent out-of-the-box MCP setup. If self-hosted AI is the requirement, this is the sharpest difference between the two products.

What does self-hosting each one take?

Relaticle runs on Laravel 13 + Filament 5, single-server deploy, which is one process to operate, and self-host free under AGPL-3.0, no feature gating. Twenty runs on Node/NestJS + Redis + Postgres + background workers, which means more moving parts to provision, monitor, and upgrade yourself. Twenty's position is self-hostable core; enterprise-tagged files are license-restricted. If you want the smallest possible operational footprint, a single Laravel server is hard to beat; if you already operate Node services with Redis and Postgres, Twenty's stack will feel familiar.

Who has the bigger community and ecosystem?

Twenty CRM has the bigger open-source footprint: 54,877 GitHub stars and 466 contributors on the twentyhq/twenty repository, against Relaticle's 1,518 stars and 7 contributors. Twenty also ships MIT-licensed apps SDK (twenty-sdk, create-twenty-app) for building custom objects, server logic, and UI components as TypeScript packages, per docs.twenty.com/developers; the core CRM repo itself stays AGPL-3.0 + Twenty Application Exception. Relaticle's extensibility is REST API plus a 37-tool MCP server; the entire codebase is AGPL-3.0, so any part can be forked and extended directly. If community size, third-party extensions, or the confidence of a large existing user base decides it for you, that point goes to Twenty; if you want a smaller codebase you can read end to end and extend directly, that favors Relaticle.

Facts verified August 13, 2026. Sources are dated in the underlying facts file. See github.com/relaticle/relaticle.

Primary sources: Relaticle pricing, Relaticle on GitHub, Twenty pricing, Twenty on GitHub.

Try Relaticle yourself

Self-host it free under AGPL-3.0, or start on the hosted plan. Both run the same open-source codebase.

Start for free Get in touch

See self-hosting options Meet Rela, the built-in AI assistant